When I first started using LinkedIn (2003), I was very choosy about what connections I would accept. I figured, if I couldn't answer a question about their skills or ability, should I really be connected? So for years, I would only accept a connection if I was willing to give a good reference to the person.
Two things changed my mind: as a CEO, I benefit from being able to see how I'm connected to a broader audience, and reading "The strength of weak ties", an influential academic paper by Mark Granovetter. Mark was on the advisory board of my last company. Here's a key highlight from the paper: They went to a middle school and had everyone list their top 8 friends in order. Then they mapped out the social web created by number 1 friends, the social web created by number 2 friends etc. What they found is that the web with the greatest span, the capacity to spread ideas to the broadest possible audience, was the web created by number 7 and number 8 friends.
I started asking around for what other people's test was, and found they quickly fell into categories:
- Any prior professional interaction (example: Dave Beisel, 500 connections)
- Prior face-to-face interaction (example: Steve Wong, 257 connections)
- Would I recommend them (example: Arthur Klepchukov, 84 connections)
- They're an actual friend or business partner (example: Michael Halligan, 336 connections)
In general, if you're engaged in social media, it's a good idea to have a policy for every platform you're on. When I talked with Dave Beisel, we had opposite policies. I'm promiscuous on Facebook, but prudish on LinkedIn. He's the other way around. For the ultimate in specification of this, you must see Lisa Brewster's policy list.